/

Nationalism rearing ugly head with greater frequency

Rightwingers think nothing of making public death threats

by Tomohiro Osaki

Staff Writer

Angry protesters took to the streets Sunday in Tokyo’s Shin-Okubo district, home to many Korean shops and restaurants, describing the Korean residents there as “cockroaches” and calling for their immediate “extermination.”

It was only the latest in a series of anti-Korean rallies in the neighborhood that have grown more intense in the past few months.

Often spearheaded by the rightwing group Zainichi Tokken wo Yurusanai Shimin no Kai (Zaitokukai), which translates literally as a citizens’ group that won’t tolerate special privileges for Korean and Chinese residents in Japan, these protests have raised eyebrows, especially for their blatant racism and outright death threats.

Some experts say this trend reflects growing public anxiety about the rise of China and South Korea at a time when, despite the recent stock rise and weakening yen, regular people still feel mired in Japan’s economic malaise.

Organized by a different nationalist group, Sunday’s demonstration appeared to have been carefully orchestrated and few literal death threats were heard. Still, the bellicose rhetoric remained unabated, with some saying the Korean residents should be “Holocausted.” The Holocaust was the mass slaughter of European civilians, especially Jews, by the Nazis during World War II.

A 25-year-old businessman from Tokyo who said he is a regular participant in such rallies said his repugnance toward Koreans emerged after finding what he described as the “ugly truth” two years ago while surfing the Internet.

“Korean residents in Japan are often using a Japanese alias, so even though they commit a crime, their real name won’t be made public,” the man, who asked that his name not be used, said, referring to the main theme of Sunday’s protest.

Though at first he balked at chanting the barrage of hateful remarks, he says he has now grown accustomed to it.

“Traditionally, Japanese people have valued politeness,” the young man said. “But look what these Korean people have done all these years to castigate Japan. So I think it’s just that Japanese people have finally learned to unleash their repressed anger.”

Another regular participant, a 36-year-old man who declined to give his name, justified the protests as an “appropriate way to defend Japan’s national interests,” and demanded “the media disclose real names of Korean criminals, otherwise Japanese people will be made a scapegoat for what they did.”

Verbal onslaughts at the street level have long existed, but their frequency has “drastically increased in the past three months,” said a 19-year-old Korean university student in Shin-Okubo.

Akira Maeda, a law professor at Tokyo Zokei University, said participants of such rallies are feeling increasingly alarmed by the rise of China and South Korea. This sense of crisis, or anxiety, leads them to play up their own nation’s perceived superiority, he explained.

The territorial disputes that have recently flared up have fueled a burst of nationalist sentiment, Maeda said, with some people growing dismayed that the Japanese are being “stripped of their rights.”

Zaitokukai leader Makoto Sakurai and other nationalists have argued that Korean residents of Japan receive preferential treatment not granted to other foreigners. This includes being granted the status of permanent residence and allowed to go by a Japanese “alias.”

They say it’s ungrateful of the Koreans to take full advantage of these benefits and yet complain about Japan’s wartime aggression. Such “privileges” are glaring in the face of Japan’s current gloom, as seen in the high suicide rate and lackluster economic growth, they argue.

The rise in nationalism also can be seen on the Internet.

According to data compiled by the office of Kan Suzuki, an Upper House lawmaker from the Democratic Party of Japan, using Tribal Media House Inc.’s Internet search tool, online use of xenophobic language has been spiking in the past few months.

Among terms subject to its survey was “zainichi” (foreign residents of Japan), which, beyond its original meaning, is now being used by rightwing netizens as a derogative reference to Koreans residing in Japan. Daily use of the word zainichi on the Internet, which stood at 7,500 on Dec. 31, rocketed to 25,000 on April 1, according to Suzuki’s office.

Prime Minister Shinzo Abe has voiced concern over a further spread of race-based invectives, saying it runs counter to Japanese people’s traditional pursuit of tolerance and harmony with others. Justice Minister Sadakazu Tanigaki has meanwhile condemned the repeated use of hate speech in recent anti-Korean demonstrations, saying it is “very worrying.”

Lawyer Yasuko Morooka pointed out during an antiracism symposium earlier this month that free speech in Japan tends to be mistaken as having the right to say anything, including hate speech.

“If left unaddressed, hate speech will only amplify inter-ethnic enmity and discrimination, and trigger physical violence against minorities and eventually genocide, as well. A war might even break out, leading to the destruction of our society,” Morooka said.

Maeda of Tokyo Zokei University said the term “hate speech” carries a somewhat innocuous connotation. Compared with “hate crime,” “hate speech” tends to be taken less seriously, he said. The downplayed concern has encouraged ultranationalists such as Zaitokukai leader Sakurai to make hate-filled speeches and somehow believe that they are causing no tangible “harm.”

“They say all they did was just vent their anger,” Maeda said.

He also commented on the virtual impunity with which these nationalists have been allowed to call for the obliteration of Koreans in Japan, and that it’s time for officials to act.

“The government should create a domestic law that unequivocally bans people from inciting discrimination,” Maeda said.

But he also said such a law should let violators off with no penalty, as that would make its enactment more viable, given the Japanese public’s preoccupation with free speech. Still, Maeda believes, the law would deliver an important message.

“The existence of such a law would give the state a good reason to crack down on such demonstrations and convince the Japanese public they shouldn’t do the same.”

  • 151E

    Echoes of Rwanda here. I wonder if the same use of language was a conscious decision.

    And why is it that the lowliest specimens amongst us always seek to dehumanize others while fancying themselves as the ubermensch, when a brief look in the mirror should be enough to disabuse them of any such delusions?

  • Sarah Morrigan

    Um… the whole thing about Koreans using “tsuumei” or Japanese-style alias has everything to do with the Japanese racism dating all the way back to the Soushi Kaimei during the Japanese occupation of Korea. Until Korean names became “cool” thanks to the Hallyu boom, Koreans in Japan were pressured by the Japanese to adopt a tsuumei. Now that the same racists and xenophobes are changing their colours and crying foul over this, calling it “zainichi tokken.” Funny how most of those racist agitators don’t identify themselves to the mass media…. Double standard.

  • Masa Chekov

    While this type of speech is completely abhorrent, I am quite confused as to why targeting Americans would somehow be worse than targeting Koreans? That’s not a slippery slope, it’s a straight line.

    All of it is bad.

  • http://www.facebook.com/gio.makyo Gio Makyo

    Pretty much par for the course with the far-right here. At the anti-nuclear demonstrations, they would show up in small numbers deliberately trying to start fights from behind a cordon of police and city hall officials, flipping the bird at people participating in the demo and calling for them to be burned alive in the molten cores of the reactors.

  • 151E

    I’m curious what moral cripple voted down this comment. Who among the readers of the Japan Times could in good conscience deny that death threats are unacceptable?

  • Chester

    I am an American of European descent who grew up in what is referred to as the “deep south” of the US during the 1960s and 1970s. This was a time in which African-Americans were visibly discriminated against and the derogatory use of the “N” word was common. Segregation along white-black lines of everything from bathrooms to schools was rampant. In retrospect, it was disgusting and entirely unbecoming a civilized society.

    While repugnant, this was within a single country. Not true in Asia. The potential for accidental escalation in Japan such that it becomes an international Korea-Japan conflict, with the tremendous loss of life and destruction, is unimaginable. More importantly, it is time for the Japanese, Korean, and Chinese people to set aside past conflicts and start to behave and think more rationally. The hatred that I have witnessed in all three societies among each other is quite alarming and seemingly out of place for the 21st century.

    Hyper-nationalism is ugly, mean-spirited, and rooted in fear. The first step to effectively countering it is recognizing this and publicly shaming those engaged in promoting it. Time for all of the governments, not just the Japanese, but the Korean and Chinese governments to take a courageous stand.

    Asia for the Asians, not the Koreans, Chinese, nor Japanese. Unity is the only way for this ideal to survive. Anything else invites conflict and ultimately outside intervention.

  • 151E

    I’ve read three of your posts on this thread.You should know that national identity is not a static thing. Modern Japanese are different from Meiji era Japanese, different from Tokugawa era Japanese, different from Heien era Japanese, etc. Likewise future generations will have culture and identity different from that of today. Trying to fossilize culture is futile.

    Now civilized protests and debate about what kind of society we want are acceptable. What is not acceptable are death treats and intimidation.

    If you read a little history you’d know that many zainichi are descendants of people forcefully brought over and assimilated but who were then disowned by the state after the war. Their treatment by the government and xenophobic elements of society is disgraceful. Your support for vocal hateful groups is hard to fathom.

  • 151E

    “[A] unified identity helps make a stable and crime free country.”

    Ever heard of the Yakuza, Cosa Nostra, or (admittedly not in the same league) Brödraskapet? Too bad your simplistic theory doesn’t agree with observed reality.

  • 紫暮龍誉

    Why is it when Chinese or Koreans do this it is classed as Patriotism, but when Japanese do it it is called as Nationalism.