Apple announces rare drop in profit, record stock buyback


Apple reported Tuesday that its quarterly profit dipped for the first time in nearly a decade as it squeezed less money from its champions in the competitive smartphone and tablet markets.

The maker of iPhones, iPads, iPods, and Macintosh computers stepped in to bolster its stock price by announcing a plan to more than double to $100 billion the amount it will spend to buy back its stock and pay out dividends.

Apple CEO Tim Cook also suggested that the company won’t release any new products until the fall, contrary to expectations that there would be a new iPhone and iPads out this summer.

Apple Inc. on Tuesday said it will expand its share buyback program to $60 billion — the largest buyback authorization in history. It is also raising its dividend by 15 percent from $2.65 to $3.05 per share. That equates to a dividend yield of 3 percent at current stock prices. The average yield for the 20 largest dividend-paying firms in the U.S. is 3.1 percent, according to Standard & Poor’s.

Investors have been clamoring for Apple to give them access to its cash hoard, which ended March at an unprecedented $145 billion. Apple’s tight grip on its cash, along with the lack of groundbreaking new products has been blamed for the steep decline in its stock price over the winter.

News of the cash bonanza coincided with the company’s release of a poor quarterly outlook for the three-month period that ends in June.

Apple released its fiscal second quarter earnings after the stock market closed Tuesday. The company’s stock initially rose 5 percent to $425 in extended trading, then retreated $2.63, or 0.7 percent, to $403.50 as the CEO talked about new products arriving in the fall.

The shares are still down 40 percent from a peak of $705.07 hit on Sept. 21, when the iPhone 5 went on sale.

“The decline in Apple’s stock price over the last couple of quarters has been very frustrating for all of us . . . but we’ll continue to do what we do best,” Cook said on a conference call with analysts after the release of the results. But he reinforced that the company’s job is not to boost its stock price in the short term.

“The most important objective for Apple will always be creating innovative products,” he added.

Apple’s results beat the consensus estimate of analysts who follow the company, though it posted its first profit decline in 10 years.

Net income was $9.5 billion, or $10.09 per share, down 18 percent from $11.6 billion, or $12.30 per share, in the same period a year ago.

Revenue was $43.6 billion, up 11 percent from last year’s $39.2 billion. Analysts were expecting earnings of $9.97 per share on revenue of $42.3 billion, according to FactSet.

For the quarter that just started, Apple said it expects sales of $33.5 billion to $35.5 billion. In the same quarter last year, sales were $35 billion. Wall Street was expecting sales of $38 billion.

The June quarter is generally a weak one for Apple, since consumers tend to wait for the next iPhone, which the company usually releases in the fall. But a year-over-year decline is a signal that Apple is failing to capitalize on the continued growth of smartphone sales. Sales are tapering off in U.S. and other mature markets, and not many consumers in India and China can afford iPhones.

Apple shipped 37.4 million iPhones in the latest quarter, up 7 percent from a year ago. That confounded expectations that shipments might fall, but it was still a weak number compared to many previous quarters, when shipments doubled year over year. The average wholesale price of an iPhone also fell to $613 as Apple cut the price of its oldest model, the iPhone 4, to appeal to buyers in developing countries.

Apple started paying a dividend last summer and has been buying back a modest number of shares, enough to balance the dilution created by its employee stock option program but not to make a dent in its cash pile. The company says it’s now expanding the buybacks, which started in October and are set to run till the end of 2015, from $10 billion to $60 billion. It’s raising the quarterly dividend starting with the payment due May 16.

The company has faced continued pressure from Wall Street over the use of its cash, which earns less than 1 percent in interest. Investors reason that if the company has no better use for the money, it should be handing it over to shareholders.

Paradoxically, cash-flush Apple will be borrowing money to support the buybacks and dividends. That’s because two-thirds of its cash resides in overseas accounts. It doesn’t bring the money into the U.S. because it prefers not to pay U.S. corporate income taxes on it. Instead, it will be using cash from U.S.-derived revenue and U.S. accounts, plus borrowed money.

Apple is effectively betting that the U.S. federal corporate tax rate of 35 percent — one of the highest in the world — will come down in the future, or that there will be a tax repatriation amnesty period, as there was in 2004.

When a company starts doling out its cash to shareholders, it’s usually a sign that its growth is stalling and it’s finding it hard to identify good ways to invest in its own business. But Apple is still growing fast by the standards of large companies, and its cash pileup is a reflection of the extraordinary success of the iPhone.

Compared to its earnings, Apple’s stock price is low. In buying Apple stock, investors are paying $9.20 for every dollar of Apple’s annual net income. By comparison, they’re willing to pay $24 for every dollar of Google’s profit.

That suggests investors have concluded Apple will never again launch a revolutionary product like the iPhone or iPad. The commitment to bigger buybacks may reinforce that impression, said David Tan, a Georgetown University assistant professor of strategy who focuses on technology.

“How are we going to read into what this move says about Apple’s long-term prospects?” Tan said. “Does this mean this is all that Apple has left to offer or is this just something temporary while we wait for the next big thing from the company?”

Investors have grown increasingly frustrated with Apple. The company has only been releasing updates to its existing line of mobile devices and computers since Cook became CEO 20 months ago instead of blazing technological trails as it did with the iPod’s 2001 unveiling, the iPhone’s 2007 debut and the iPad’s introduction in 2010, said Lauren Balter, an analyst for Oracle Investment Research.

At the same time, Samsung Electronics has been gaining market share with larger smartphone screens and other features while Google Inc. is creating a buzz with its own Nexus tablets. Google is also expanding into “wearable computing” with Internet-connected glasses that are expected to go on sale late this year or early next year.

  • Spudator

    The big question on everybody’s mind when Steve Jobs died was whether Apple would be able to continue doing incredible things without his leadership. I think that question’s been answered now; Apple seems to be losing its way and the problem has to be its CEO, Tim Cook. Cook may be a competent businessman, and was clearly a good lieutenant under Jobs, but I don’t think he comes close to having Jobs’s vision, and it was that vision that made Apple special. Mind you, I’m not sure anybody has Jobs’s vision; he really was one of a kind and an almost impossible act to follow.

    I hope I’m wrong about Cook and that he has some insanely great products in the pipeline, but after the underwhelming iPhone 5 release and the Mapplegate disaster, I’m not feeling too confident. It looks like the future of mobile computing could belong to Google and Samsung.

    • Stick

      Agreed Spudator, I also think that traditionally, the heart and sole of apple (simplicity aside) was it’s branding as a professional, high-end workstation built with the professional multimedia artist in mind. This was a reputation they rightfully earned early on but as of lately I think there reputation far exceeds what they are actually doing for the pro market. That being said, Apple has set its sights on a new customer. In my opinion this transition was very successful as many new consumers fell in love with Apple products for the first time. The question is will Apple be able to hold onto its new customers? In time the “this is new, this is neat” and “novelty app” craze will die down. Will Apple be able to maintain customer loyalty with so many other affordable choices that perform just as well if not better in some cases? What’s there major advantage or niche?