Kim may look for way to save face

North Korea tensions near boiling point


Soaring tensions on the Korean Peninsula have seen dire North Korean threats met with an unusually assertive U.S. response that analysts warn could take a familiar game into dangerous territory.

By publicly highlighting its recent deployment of nuclear-capable B-52 and stealth bombers over South Korea, Washington has, at times, almost appeared to be purposefully goading an already apoplectic Pyongyang. “There certainly seems to be an element of ‘let’s show we’re taking the gloves off this time’ about the U.S. stance,” said Paul Carroll, program director at the Ploughshares Fund.

And the North has responded in kind, declaring Saturday that it was now in a “state of war” with South Korea.

Security crises on the Korean Peninsula have come and gone over the decades and have tended to follow a similar pattern of white-knuckle brinkmanship that threatens but finally pulls back from catastrophic conflict.

The current crisis, with Pyongyang lashing out at a combination of U.N. sanctions and South Korea-U.S. military exercises, diverges from precedent in terms of the context and the main characters involved. It follows the two landmark events that triggered the U.N. sanctions and redrew the strategic balance on the peninsula: The North’s successful long-range rocket launch in December and its third nuclear test in February.

Both may have emboldened North Korea to overplay its hand, while at the same time prompting Washington to decide there was already too much at stake to consider folding. In addition, both North and South Korea have new, untested leaders with a strong domestic motivation to prove their mettle in any showdown.

Bruce Klingner, a Korea expert at the Heritage Foundation, believes the danger of “miscalculation” is especially high from North Korea’s young supremo, Kim Jong Un. Kim was not only emboldened by the successful rocket and nuclear tests, but “also by the knowledge that Seoul and Washington have never struck back in any significant way after previous deadly attacks.”

This time around, however, South Korea has signaled it would respond with interest, and the message sent by the B-52 and stealth bomber flights is that it has the U.S. firmly in its corner.

Peter Hayes, who heads the Nautilus Institute, an Asia-focused think tank, points out that the B-52 deployment carried a particular — and potentially dangerous — resonance.

After a bloody border incident in 1976 left two American soldiers dead, the United States spent weeks sending flights of B-52 bombers up the Korean Peninsula, veering off just before they entered the North’s airspace. Then-U.S. Secretary of State Henry Kissinger commented that he had “never seen the North Koreans so scared.”

Hayes warned that replaying the B-52 threat could prove to be “strategically stupid” by reviving the North’s historic and deep-rooted fear of a U.S. nuclear strike. “The B-52 deployment also declares loudly and clearly that they have forced the U.S. to play the game of nuclear war with North Korea,” Hayes said. “It tells them it has reached the hallowed status of a nuclear-armed state that matters enough to force a simulated nuclear-military response.”

The possible endgame scenarios to the current crisis are numerous, but none point to an obvious path for defusing the situation peacefully. Most analysts rule out the prospect of a full-scale war on the grounds that North Korea knows it would lose, just as it knows that launching any sort of nuclear strike would be suicidal. But after threatening everything from an artillery assault to nuclear Armageddon, there is also a sense that Kim Jong Un has pushed himself into a corner and must do something to avoid a damaging loss of face.

Scott Snyder, a senior fellow for Korea studies with the Council on Foreign Relations, suggested that the U.S., having delivered its message loud and clear, should now provide Kim with a way out. “There is a need for the United States and South Korea to offer some clear diplomatic gestures of reassurance toward the North that can help the North Koreans climb down, calm down, and change course,” Snyder said.

  • This crisis offers also the possible fall of the North Korean regime. They certainly don’t have the resources for a war neither technologically nor economically and the recent overplay from North Korea should be exploited to such an endgame. There is no need to follow Snyder’s advice giving the North Koreans a way out. It’s simply time to end their sixty year long charade and the chance has never been better than now!

    • but what are the odds of the possible armed conflict, if it would take place? Considering the world? And who is backing the Norths up to act so… stubbornly inadequate?

  • Paul Martin

    I have lived all over Asia including Japan 4 years (Sons married to japanese) Hong Kong, Singapore, Taiwan and South Korea 1 and a half years. So as a seasoned reporter and foreign correspondent I have a pretty good idea about the region and it’s problems. IF Kim and North Korea lose it and war eventuates there is NO question in my mind that they will launch everything theyv’e got at South Korea, American bases and Tokyo ! Anyone doubting that is either naive or in self denial !