|

The Battle of Okinawa: America’s good war gone bad

Seventy years after the final epic clash of WWII, has U.S. betrayed the ideals its service members died fighting for?

by

Meta

Fumiko Shimabukuro will never forget the kindness of Americans during the Battle of Okinawa.

In the spring of 1945, the 15-year-old fled for days from cave to cave beneath bombardments so ferocious that Okinawans compared them to storms of steel. Shimabukuro witnessed scenes no civilian should ever see: a baby decapitated by shrapnel being carried by its mother, ponds dyed red by the blood of corpses.

Eventually, in the south of the island, Shimabukuro found shelter in a small cave packed with 20 other civilians.

“American soldiers approached our hiding place and ordered us out. But we were all too afraid to move,” she said.

Years of Japanese propaganda had taught Okinawans that U.S. troops would torture then kill their captives; moreover, there was the fear that if they left the cave, they’d be executed by Japanese soldiers, whose military code stated surrender was dishonorable.

Trapped between both sides, Shimabukuro and her fellow Okinawans syed put. Even when the Americans fired a shot into their midst, nobody exited. Then the GIs called in a flamethrower.

“Around 20 Okinawans went into that cave — but only seven of us came out. When I emerged, my kimono was burned to my skin and I was half naked,” Shimabukuro recalls. “I thought the Americans were going to kill me.”

But they didn’t. The Americans brought Shimabukuro clothes and food and they treated her wounds.

“Without the Americans’ kindness, I wouldn’t be here today. They helped me to recover and I was so grateful. At the time, all Okinawans felt the same.”


Launched on April 1, 1945, the U.S. assault on Okinawa’s main island was one of the largest operations ever undertaken by the U.S. military. Involving 1,500 ships and more than half a million troops, it also dispatched an unprecedented humanitarian task force to deal with Okinawa’s population of 450,000 civilians. It readied 5,000 support personnel including interpreters and doctors, distributed booklets explaining Okinawan culture and drilled U.S. troops in survival Japanese such as “Dete koi!” (“Come out!”), which Shimabukuro remembers hearing the day she was rescued.

Thanks to these preparations, within a month of landing the U.S. military was caring for 128,000 Okinawan civilians. By the end of June it had rescued another 80,000 — around half of whom were wounded but survived due to American medical treatment.

According to “Descent into Hell,” a civilian history of the Battle of Okinawa published by Ryukyu Shimpo last year, the U.S. military treated captured Japanese soldiers humanely, too. Initially it interred them in POW camps on Okinawa before shipping many to the U.S., where the prisoners gained weight and recall being treated more kindly than by their own officers.

This conduct stands in stark contrast to the behavior of Imperial Japanese Army soldiers. Throughout World War II, the Japanese military subjected Allied POWs to slave labor, beatings, starvation and medical experiments — leading to a mortality rate that, according to Gavan Daws’ “Prisoners of the Japanese” (1994), approached 25 percent. One such atrocity occurred on April 15, 1945, on Okinawa’s Ishigaki Island, when three captured U.S. Navy aviators were tortured — including one used for bayonet practice — before execution.

Japanese troops extended such barbarity to Okinawan civilians — and one survivor who knows this better perhaps than anyone is Masahide Ota. At the age of 19, he was conscripted into the Japanese Army’s Blood and Iron Student Corps, where he was handed a rifle, 120 bullets, a pair of grenades and ordered into combat. More than half of his schoolmates were killed — he describes their deaths as more like those of worms than humans — and he himself only survived by hiding for weeks on a rocky beach.

Ota’s wartime experiences instilled in him a profound hatred of war. Between 1990 and 1998, he served as governor of Okinawa, during which time he pursued pacifist policies. Today he continues to be an outspoken critic of the Japanese atrocities against Okinawan civilians that many mainland politicians would prefer to forget.

Drawing on data collated by the Okinawa school district, Ota shows that, during the Battle of Okinawa, Japanese troops executed more than 1,000 Okinawans as “spies” — their only crime being attempts to surrender or speaking in Okinawan, which, at the time, was banned by military authorities. Ota also cites a 1960 Ministry of Health and Welfare report that reveals that at least 10,000 Okinawan children died when Japanese troops forced them from their shelters.

Ota likens Okinawans’ experiences of the battle to being “attacked by tigers at the front gate and wolves at the back” — they were trapped by both the U.S. and Japanese militaries.

By the time America announced that Okinawa had been secured on June 21, almost a quarter of a million people had died — including more than 140,000 Okinawa civilians.

Following the cease-fire, the U.S. military maintained its humane treatment of survivors. It established schools, orphanages and clinics; in September 1945 it organized elections in which Okinawans — including, for the first time, women — could vote for their councilors and mayors.

“Right after the war was over, the American military government provided us with food, clothing and medicine,” Ota told The Japan Times. “Okinawan people were so thankful and friendly to the U.S. military.”

During World War II, Americans had gone into combat to fight the spread of fascism and bring democracy to the world. On Okinawa, at least, it seemed that the U.S. was living up to these ideals.

However by the end of the decade, America’s good war on Okinawa had turned very, very bad. According to a November 1949 Time magazine article titled “Okinawa: Forgotten Island,” between March and September 1949, U.S. service members had committed 29 murders, 18 rapes, 16 robberies and 33 assaults against the island’s 600,000 residents. The article described troops’ morale and discipline as worse than that of “any U.S. force in the world.”

Three years later, the plight of Okinawans grew even worse when the Treaty of San Francisco — which ended the U.S. occupation of mainland Japan — placed Okinawa under U.S. control. The island had become the victim of a new Washington mind-set that replaced the fight against Nazism with the Red Scare. Mao Zedong had taken China in 1949 and then the Korean War had broken out in 1950. Situated in the East China Sea, Okinawa was regarded by Washington and Tokyo as a bulwark against the expansion of communism. With this in mind, the U.S. embarked upon its second Battle of Okinawa.


Known locally as the time of “bayonets and bulldozers,” in the early 1950s U.S. troops drove Okinawan farmers from their land to make way for new or expanded military bases. One of the most infamous of these confiscations took place on the island of Iejima in 1955, where American troops first tricked residents into signing voluntary evacuation papers before dragging those who refused from their homes, bulldozing their farms and slaughtering their livestock.

As a result of these land seizures, many Okinawans had few job opportunities other than to work on the new bases.

At this time, Okinawan military employees were subjected to a racist pay scale that pegged their wages far below those of their American, Filipino and Japanese colleagues. Moreover, Okinawans were often assigned the most dangerous jobs, including defusing unexploded ordnance and handling toxic chemicals without safety equipment.

During this period, Battle of Okinawa survivor Shimabukuro worked as a maid on the U.S. Marine base in Nago City called Camp Schwab. The base, like many others on Okinawa, was named after a U.S. service member who’d died in the Battle of Okinawa.

“The commander always told us how grateful we should be. He said it was only because America won the war that we Okinawans had clothes and homes. Without the U.S., we’d be living naked in chicken shacks (tori goya),” she says.

With little employment in the area, Shimabukuro endured working at Camp Schwab for 10 years. She finally quit during the Vietnam War, when the U.S. military’s usage of Okinawa bases in that conflict made her feel complicit in the deaths of Southeast Asian civilians.

At this time, for many Okinawans, the sight of U.S. bombers over the island’s skies brought back horrific memories of World War II — a feeling compacted by the violence of U.S. troops who extracted their own Vietnam War trauma by assaulting, raping and murdering Okinawan civilians. Between 1965 and 1975, for example, no fewer than 17 Okinawans were killed by U.S. service members.

Former governor Ota agrees that the Vietnam War erased many Okinawans’ lingering sense of gratitude to the U.S. military. Today, he argues the notion of an island under attack from both American tigers and Japanese wolves still holds true — and the proof is clearest in Henoko Bay, Nago city. In particular, the district’s sea maintains a special place in the hearts of World War II survivors who evacuated there and were saved from starvation by its fish and seaweed.

Now, Tokyo and Washington are working together to landfill Henoko Bay and construct a new U.S. base replete with twin 1.8-km runways and a deep-sea port. Again, in the spring of 2015, Henoko Bay is packed with government ships, reminding many elderly Okinawans of World War II; furthermore, injuries to demonstrators in confrontations with the Japanese authorities outside Camp Schwab trigger painful recollections of Imperial Japanese Army brutality.

“When I see these preparations (for the new base), it gives me a horrible feeling that Okinawa will be dragged into war once again,” says Shimabukuro, who was injured last year during a demonstration against the installation where she used to work. “If the base is built, Okinawans will be killed here all over again.”

Both the island’s governor, Takeshi Onaga, and local mayor Susumu Inamine are against the new base plan, and opinion polls put Okinawan opposition at 80 percent. However, the Japanese government under Shinzo Abe insists construction will proceed as planned.

Many Okinawans believe the current administration underestimates the significance of the Battle of Okinawa in islanders’ collective conscience. A case in point is last June’s commemoration ceremony of the end of the Battle of Okinawa, where Abe’s speech contained large chunks of text apparently copy-pasted from his address the previous year.

Such insincerity toward those who died in the Battle of Okinawa is also apparent on the U.S. side. As reported in these pages, the U.S. military on Okinawa has developed close ties to Channel Sakura, a Japanese neo-nationalist TV network. Guests on the station often glorify the role of the Japanese military in WWII, including the denial of wartime atrocities such as those committed against Okinawan civilians and captured U.S. troops on Okinawa.

Among many Americans outraged by the U.S. military’s links to Japanese neo-nationalists is Dennis Halpin, a former adviser to the House Foreign Affairs Committee and currently visiting scholar at Johns Hopkins University.

Halpin notes that Camp Schwab was named after Albert E. Schwab, who was killed during the Battle of Okinawa and posthumously awarded a Medal of Honor.

“Those Americans who have chosen to associate themselves with Channel Sakura should reflect on whether they want to be connected with a news organization whose goal is to rewrite World War II history and, in so doing, diminish the sacrifice of Albert Schwab and others of the Greatest Generation,” Halpin told The Japan Times.

Halpin, whose cousin served as a marine in the Battle of Okinawa, urges current service members on Okinawa not to betray the memory of those who died fighting fascism on the island in the war.

“Those living U.S. veterans of the Battle of Okinawa would expect those who have come after them to honor their legacy and sacrifices.”.

Comments: community@japantimes.co.jp

  • Andrew Neuman

    “… a feeling compacted by the violence of U.S. troops…” May I suggest that instead “compacted” the writer meant “compounded”?

  • Liars N. Fools

    The condescension and arrogance of American and main island Japanese civil and military leaders deciding Okinawa’s fate without any real consent from the Okinawan people should be counted as a human rights violation.

    It is clear that Okinawans have a history and a dignity born from tragedy and made to undergo even more travail. I am in favor of an American security presence in Japan, but if it is so concentrated in Okinawa so as to constitute an injustice, then it should not stand.

    This is especially the case when the many hollowed out prefectures of main island Japan can house American bases. Why not try Shimane, for example, with a rapidly aging population, lots of young people left, and decent enough existing infrastructure that can be turned into military facilities?

  • Nathaniel Reisenburg

    I actually tried to make a post explaining that parts of this editorial were a little one-sided. However, my post was deleted. After reading the other posts here, I am left with the impression that the key to surviving the moderators is to abstain from disagreeing with their paper’s points of view.

    • Jamie Bakeridge

      You have only just realized that?? That has been policy for years. You are free to think what you like, but criticizing the JT in writing is a capital offense.

  • bombkiller007

    Also interesting is Dennis Halpin, not exactly a neutral on the issue of Japanese politics. His rhetorical comparison is far off the mark when he tries to state that the Marines, Soldiers, and Sailors that died on Okinawa would be upset over the Sakurai So issue. To deny Japan the ability to voice its own opinion and make them “eternal enemies of blood” as Halpin is attempting is grotesque. It reminds me of the old racists stating Native American memorials and civil rights causes should somehow not be enacted as that would “dishonor” the memory of the Americans soldiers that fought against them. War is a geopolitical game, Mr. Halpin has added the dangerous factor of a type of “blood libel” into the mix when he tries to equate Marine sacrifice with non support of Japanese who ultimately support the US Marines and expansion on Okinawa……nice try to confuse the issue.

  • Jamie Bakeridge

    You have only just realized that?? That has been policy for years. You are free to think what you like, but criticizing the JT in writing is a capital offense. Silly boy.

  • Gunto

    Nobody points out the fact that the Okinawans for the most part supported Japan wholeheartly until Apr 1945. There was no demostrations in Naha during the colonial expansion era. The islands men took part in all the Campaign’s of Japan in the Pacific War. They weren’t there in April 1945.

    • 72_Veteran

      Okinawa has always been treated as second class citizens since its forcible annexation in 1879. Japanese shot Okinawans speaking their native language as spies, and tried to eradicate it through “Hogan fuda”. To the degree that Japanese propaganda terrified the Okinawans of the Americans, I would agree that they supported Japan; but Japan purposely staked out Okinawa as a goat to be killed in order to protect the “real” Japan. Okinawa has been betrayed over and over by both US and Tokyo and this continues.

  • def

    Same old American defence of the situation. Imagine: Plant a Chinese base in Kentucky, give the Chinese soldiers a SOFA where they cannot be tried for any crimes in America except through Chinese military trials, and that the placement of the base is through Washington against the will of Kentucky. How many Chinese rapes or murders would those in Kentucky rationalise? One rape would be utterly unacceptable. One murder would be unacceptable. Hypothetically, the people of Kentucky would lose their minds. Okinawans are pretty tolerant of the horrible situation they’ve been put in, comparably.

    Inevitably, Americans’ defence of the situation ends up boiling down to ‘Japan started the war,’ so… unfortunately the people being punished here are not Japanese, they are Ryukyu.

    No American would consider this acceptable if the situation was reversed.