The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs has awarded two more former service members compensation for exposure to Agent Orange while serving on Okinawa during the 1960s and ’70s.
An army truck driver who came into contact with the dioxin-tainted defoliant as he unloaded barrels at Naha Port in 1966 is receiving benefits for lung cancer attributed to his exposure. The second veteran, a former marine stationed on the island in the early 1970s, developed Hodgkin’s lymphoma and type 2 diabetes mellitus as a result of his work with contaminated military equipment shipped to Okinawa from the war in Vietnam, the VA ruled.
Prior to the discovery of these two successful claims, it was widely believed that only one U.S. veteran had ever won compensation for exposure to Agent Orange on Okinawa. That 1998 VA ruling, in the case of a soldier poisoned by the defoliant in the island’s northern jungles, caused consternation among former U.S. service members and Okinawa residents when it was reported in 2007.
Despite Okinawa serving as a forward staging post for the Vietnam War, in which the U.S. utilized over 76 million liters of defoliants, the Pentagon has repeatedly denied that Agent Orange was ever transported via the island.
The recently revealed VA award regarding the army truck driver exposed at Naha Port was decided in July 2010. In his claim for compensation, the former soldier explained that he had served on the docks with the 44th Transportation Company between 1965 and 1966. According to his statement, “We provided logistical support for the Republic of Vietnam war effort. Our mission was to unload large transport ships. Such items as 55 gallon drums of herbicides, oils, solvents and other materials. We handled the drums with (sic) loading and unloading, and often these drums leaked which contaminated our hands and clothing.”
The veteran’s claim was supported by “buddy statements” from five fellow GIs corroborating his account of exposure to Agent Orange at Naha Port. In its judgement, the VA ruled that “Lung cancer associated with herbicide exposure was substantiated by the information and evidence in (the) VA’s possession.”
It is not known whether the five veterans who supplied supporting statements are also receiving compensation for exposure to Agent Orange.
The case involving the former marine was decided by the VA in September 2008. According to department documents, the service member “worked in Okinawa, Japan on the Marine Corps base as a warehouseman in 1972 and 1973. He alleges that his unit, the 3rd Service Battalion of the 3rd Marine Division, received equipment from the combat arms battalions operating in Vietnam for repair and decontamination.”
The sick veteran’s claim was supported by two other marines who stated that it was common practice in the final stages of the Vietnam War to ship goods contaminated with Agent Orange to Okinawa for cleaning. While the VA documents do not mention the specific installation where the exposure occurred, at the time the headquarters of the 3rd Marine Division was at Camp Courtney in Uruma City.
In its ruling, the VA deemed that “the veteran was exposed to herbicides used in the Vietnam conflict while serving on Okinawa in 1972 and 1973” and granted him benefits for Hodgkin’s lymphoma and type 2 diabetes mellitus.
In addition to these two successful awards, VA records reveal that between 1996 and 2010 a further 132 veterans claimed that they had been exposed to Agent Orange while serving on Okinawa during the Vietnam War era. Their accounts suggest that the defoliant was widely stored and used on the island — one alleges that surplus defoliants were dumped on Camp Zukeran (currently Camp Foster) in 1962, while another claims that hundreds of barrels of Agent Orange were stored at Kadena Air Base in the early 1970s.
The 132 veterans are all suffering from one or more of the “presumptive conditions” the U.S. government recognizes as being related to Agent Orange exposure.
All U.S. service members who stepped foot in Vietnam from 1962 to 1975 — as well as those who served along the Korean DMZ or in Thailand at certain times — are eligible for compensation for these 14 illnesses. But since the Pentagon insists it has no records pertaining to the presence of these defoliants on Okinawa, the vast majority of the 132 claims were rejected. In roughly 10 percent of the cases, however, the VA postponed its decision until it received further information from the Department of Defense or VA regional offices.
Michelle Gatz, a Minnesota-based veterans service officer and researcher on Agent Orange on Okinawa, worries that these 132 veterans may be just the tip of the iceberg.
“Many other veterans are intimidated by the paperwork involved in filing a claim. Others may have died while waiting for their claims to be decided,” said Gatz. “The true number of veterans sick due to their exposure to Agent Orange on Okinawa is likely much higher than these 132.”
Meanwhile, veterans hoping that the two successful cases will open the floodgates to extensive compensation for those sickened by dioxins on Okinawa are likely to be disappointed. According to VA policy, its rulings are nonprecedential, meaning claims are decided on their own merits and not determined by prior cases.
Joe Sipala, leader of the Agent Orange Okinawa grassroots campaign, believes that the current economic climate is also guiding the VA’s decisions.
“The U.S. is trillions of dollars in debt, so there will never be full compensation like there is for Vietnam veterans. But, as with those who served along the Korean DMZ and Thailand, I hope the VA might start to compensate more Okinawa veterans who handled these defoliants on specific bases at certain times while serving on the island.”
Send comments on this issue and story ideas to firstname.lastname@example.org